THONIS AI-AUGMENTED SOLUTIONS · CONNECTED BY DESIGN
Your team spends too much time finding information, copying it between tools and chasing decisions. THONIS helps connect that work across the systems they already use, with AI assistance where it can make a useful difference.
Power Automate, Microsoft 365 and n8n workflows, scoped around your tools and approval requirements.
Start with a free written fit review. Describe the work and deadline; we will suggest a next step. A call is optional. Paid work starts only after agreement on scope, fee and acceptance criteria.
Illustrative sequence: recurring work is connected to approved sources, context and an owner. Uncertain output remains open for a named person. Nothing is approved or sent automatically.
01Start with the friction
A request arrives. Someone searches, copies, checks and chases. Then the same work returns.
SECURITY OPERATIONS · 10:42
The same question returns because the last answer was never bound to anything.
PILOT ENVIRONMENT · PRODUCT DIRECTIONA recurring question, asked where the team already works
02Connect what is already known
THONIS connects the source, its context and its owner to the next draft or handoff.
VULN-2048
Assembled from approved records rather than retyped from them.
PILOT ENVIRONMENT · PRODUCT DIRECTIONThe answer, drawn from records that already exist
03Keep the boundary visible
Uncertain output remains open and goes to a named person. Nothing is approved or sent automatically.
PILOT ENVIRONMENT · PRODUCT DIRECTIONAssistance drafts and compares; a named person decides and accepts
04Make one useful change
Bring the recurring task, the systems involved and the result your team needs. We will suggest a bounded next step in writing.
Describe your workflowNEXT ACTIONS
Nothing is sent, approved or closed without someone choosing it.
PILOT ENVIRONMENT · PRODUCT DIRECTIONThe next move is a decision, with the records it rests on cited
Workflow Surveyor · scoped consulting
For a small agency, contractor or technical team with work spread across documents and tools. Start with a fixed-scope diagnostic of the approved systems and recurring tasks.
Agree a deliverable of three to five workflow recommendations, each with a trigger, inputs, owner, proposed steps, exceptions and acceptance checks. Select n8n, Power Automate or an ordinary rule according to the actual environment.
Review the recommendations before funding a build. The diagnostic is a consulting engagement; it does not require buying a new software subscription. Access, licensing, data handling, fee and timing are agreed in the scope.
Scope a workflow diagnostic →Consulting and implementation alongside the four Dextra products
If the scope is clear, we can quote implementation directly. If it needs investigation, we first scope a paid assessment. You receive the deliverables, fee, timing and review process before deciding.
Map one workflow, its owners and source records. Identify the work worth automating, what should stay manual, and how you will judge the result.
Paid assessment deliverable: a prioritized plan and a scoped implementation proposal you can act on.Connect intake, document comparison, drafting or routing to the actual work. Bound agent access by task, records and expiry; test the exceptions and keep consequential authority with named people.
A scoped implementation, documented limits and an agreed acceptance test.When the complete workflow needs a dedicated place to work, design a tailored workspace for source information, review, decisions and handoffs.
A separately scoped solution with clear ownership, support and exit terms.Illustrative scopes · not completed engagements
These fictional examples show how one task becomes a reviewable piece of paid work. The systems are the customer's tools; access, connectors, licensing and the delivery plan are confirmed during scoping.
Fit and trust boundary
We do not need sensitive evidence in the first conversation. We do need enough context to identify the workflow, authority, constraints, and result.
Security and trust are designed before connection. We preserve authoritative systems and named human authority. Identity, least privilege, data minimization, tenant and environment boundaries, logging, retention, model and vendor constraints, fail-closed behavior, human approval, testing, and rollback are scoped to the use case. Claims remain bounded to implemented and verified behavior.
Yes. Start with the expected result, what actually happens, the tools involved and the deadline. Once there is an approved way to inspect the flow and reproduce the problem, we can agree a repair scope. If the cause or dependencies are unclear, we first scope the investigation.
No replacement is assumed. We scope around the tools and records you already use. Your tenant policies, permissions, connector availability and licenses determine which connection is appropriate. Any additional platform cost is identified before you agree to the work.
No. A deterministic rule or an ordinary automation may be sufficient. AI can help with interpretation, comparison or drafting when the task needs it. We define how uncertain output is reviewed and who authorizes consequential actions before using it.
The agreed scope identifies the changed workflow, documented configuration and limits, test cases, exception handling and handoff. You and the accountable owner agree the expected results before implementation. Passing a test, authorizing deployment and accepting the delivered work are separate decisions.
Describe one task, its trigger and intended result, the current failure or manual step, systems involved, owner and deadline. State whether you need a repair, a new workflow or help finding the bottleneck. Keep credentials, customer records and sensitive files out of the inquiry; we can define an approved intake path after fit is established.
Start with one workflow
Tell us what needs to be finished, where it gets stuck and when it matters. Workflow facts are enough for the first conversation.
Describe your workflow