Dextra AssuranceOps
Continuous scanning, AI-powered pentesting, AI agent monitoring and evidence packages — connected to compliance, remediation and human approval.
In development. See current implementation and what comes next.
Built forSecurity, compliance, AI governance and engineering teams.
The complete AssuranceOps product in development: from recurring checks and authorized testing to remediation, evidence packages and ongoing review.
Current product view · synthetic workflow
The open fictional buyer-review story demonstrates evidence review, named approval, and a simulated return path.
This public view uses synthetic, rights-cleared data. It illustrates a workflow without exposing customer records or implementation-sensitive detail.
Illustrative synthetic product viewThe open buyer-review scenario uses fictional records and a simulated return path. Selected workflows, including first-time setup, have separately been implemented and tested in a local test environment. Platform scope describes the intended full direction. Live evaluations, coverage of AI agents at runtime, and delivery to downstream systems remain to be verified.
Compare with your current tools: When evidence changes after approval, can your current tools show what was reviewed, who decided, and which answers need review again?
Illustrative sequence for AssuranceOps. Reviews, findings, evidence, exceptions, owners, approvals, and follow-up live in different portals, files, tickets, and inboxes. Teams repeatedly rebuild what applied, what was supported, and who accepted the remaining risk. We're building AssuranceOps to connect continuous scanning, AI-powered pentesting, AI agent monitoring, compliance operations and evidence packages in one workspace. Find risks, assign fixes, verify remediation and keep the evidence behind each human-approved decision as systems change. AI may classify, compare, summarize, and draft. Named people retain authority for assertions, exceptions, risk acceptance, attestations, and external responses.
01Where the work breaks
Reviews, findings, evidence, exceptions, owners, approvals, and follow-up live in different portals, files, tickets, and inboxes. Teams repeatedly rebuild what applied, what was supported, and who accepted the remaining risk.
CEDARLINE HEALTH · SOC 2 SECURITY REVIEW
Three questions imported. No prior evidence or answers to carry forward.
SYNTHETIC TENANTA question the review cannot answer yet
02What changes
We're building AssuranceOps to connect continuous scanning, AI-powered pentesting, AI agent monitoring, compliance operations and evidence packages in one workspace. Find risks, assign fixes, verify remediation and keep the evidence behind each human-approved decision as systems change.
CEDARLINE HEALTH · SOC 2 SECURITY REVIEW
The posture changed because a named person bound a versioned snapshot to it.
SYNTHETIC TENANTThe same question, now resting on something
03Where authority stops
AI may classify, compare, summarize, and draft. Named people retain authority for assertions, exceptions, risk acceptance, attestations, and external responses.
DEC-2026-0001
SYNTHETIC TENANTFour gates, a named authority, and the digests it is bound to
04What you are left with
The next reviewer can follow the evidence, responsible person, unresolved conditions, and reason for reopening without treating an earlier approval as a permanent answer.
Start an AssuranceOps fit reviewBUYER PACKAGE · VERSION 1
The package says it is not approved rather than implying consent. Building it is not delivery: nothing has been sent, received, or accepted.
SYNTHETIC TENANTA result that states what it is not
What changes in daily work
Reviews, findings, evidence, exceptions, owners, approvals, and follow-up live in different portals, files, tickets, and inboxes. Teams repeatedly rebuild what applied, what was supported, and who accepted the remaining risk.
The next reviewer can follow the evidence, responsible person, unresolved conditions, and reason for reopening without treating an earlier approval as a permanent answer.
One guided operating flow
Name the service, use case, affected assets, decision owner, deadline, and governing criteria.
Collect permitted observations and run authorized tests. Tie each answer or finding to current, applicable evidence.
Validate findings, assign fixes, retest and route the exact exception or missing fact to its owner.
Present the evidence, limitations, and proposed result to the accountable human authority.
Prepare the approved response, supplier decision, report or evidence package for its intended reviewer.
When evidence, access, scope, incidents, or requirements change, reopen only the affected work.
Recognizable starting workflows
Before you evaluate
We're building a connected product for continuous scanning and monitoring, authorized AI-powered pentesting, AI agent assessment and governance, compliance operations, remediation and reviewable evidence packages. It will carry work from scoped checks through findings, fixes, retesting, human decisions and ongoing reassessment. The build-status section below separates current local implementation from remaining work; the public example illustrates one buyer-review workflow.
You can reuse a security questionnaire answer when its meaning, scope and supporting evidence still fit the new question. Similar wording alone is not enough. Check the service, deployment, exceptions, source version and approval before returning the answer.
Your existing systems remain authoritative for their records. AssuranceOps is designed to connect the question, evidence, owner and human decision around one review. The public story uses a simulated return path; a connection to your actual portal or evidence store needs separate implementation and verification.
Use the same synthetic questions and approved sample documents in each tool. Include a supported answer, missing evidence, a service-specific exception and conflicting sources. Check review, changed evidence and the exact returned wording as well as the first draft. These are evaluation checks, not measured AssuranceOps outcomes.
Use the security questionnaire checklist · Explore security review services
Product development
AssuranceOps is in development. The complete platform scope above is the product we're building; selected workflows can already be inspected in local implementation or the public example.
Name the system or service, the owner, the applicable criteria and the period being reviewed.
Connect controls, tests and evidence; track remediation and present the exact decision for human review.
Preserve sources, versions, unresolved conditions, named decisions and the changes that require renewed review.
These workflows are locally implemented; the complete platform is not generally available as production software. The local application is separate from the fictional public example. A customer deployment needs its own approved hosting, identity, source connections and acceptance checks.
Production integrations, customer-specific compliance, operational authorization, and accepted results require implementation and evidence in the selected environment.
Track control records, evidence versions, owners and validity windows. Retain the evidence behind a recorded test and flag missing or stale support.
Complete scope-specific obligation and framework mapping beyond the current representative catalogs, show uncovered requirements, and extend source-linked control advice with proposed policy and document changes for human review.
Calculate control health, evidence gaps and overdue work from recorded controls and evidence. Record scheduled reassessment attempts. A Tenable read adapter imports finding windows; it does not run scans.
Validate ongoing operation with approved live sources, source-specific freshness and complete historical health views. Comprehensive hosted monitoring is not verified.
Link questionnaire drafts to recorded facts, review supplier evidence and retain a versioned determination. Keep changed evidence and due reviews visible.
Validate customer portal connections and the full document-assisted advisory path. Preparing a response does not establish delivery or buyer acceptance.
Record authorized testing scope, findings, remediation and retest history. Governed execution uses a synthetic provider; live Strix execution is not enabled.
Complete and verify isolation and execution lifecycle controls before authorized live Strix testing, then evaluate results independently.
Record agent revisions, declared tools and permissions, evidence and named approvals. Preserve the reviewed revision after change. Case-bound assistance requires approval before applying a proposed change.
Complete AI inventory, risk and obligation mapping, intended-use quality, fairness, privacy and robustness evaluations, live runtime observation, and incident response with reassessment. System-wide plain-English chat with supporting record links is planned; case assistance does not prove full coverage.
Track evidence-qualified POA&M closure and reopening, federal reporting records and bounded OSCAL exchange with diagnostics.
Validate the customer's framework, system boundary, reporting profile and receiving tool. Bounded schema checks do not establish full program conformance or agency authorization.
One workflow, within the whole product. The open buyer-review example lets you inspect synthetic evidence, approval and change handling. The scoped buyer-review service is a starting point. Neither represents the complete AssuranceOps platform.
People retain risk acceptance, external release and assessment authority. Recorded permissions are not proof of runtime enforcement; an export is not recipient acceptance.
Integration, compliance, and trust
Buyer portals, evidence stores, scanners, trust centers, contracts, identity, CRM, GRC, and ticketing remain authoritative for the records they own.
AssuranceOps keeps the scoped question, applicable evidence, exception, owner, decision, returned result, and later change in one security assurance case.
Responses, decisions, reports, and tasks can be prepared for selected destinations. The public story simulates the return path; actual transport, delivery, and recipient acceptance require separate evidence.
Connect only the customer-approved read or write path needed for the workflow, with explicit identity, permission, receipt, failure, and recovery behavior.
Unsupported, stale, contradictory, or out-of-scope evidence remains visible instead of becoming a polished claim.
A material change to the payload, evidence, scope, or governing criteria clears dependent approval.
Commercial, enterprise, and federal criteria remain separate unless the case proves that a requirement actually applies.
AssuranceOps can map work to customer-selected security, supplier-risk, vulnerability, and compliance criteria. It does not replace an independent assessment, certification, accreditation, authorization, legal judgment, or buyer decision when those are required.
Start with the workflow that keeps breaking
Describe the systems or AI agents you need to assess, your scanning or monitoring needs, current tools, decision owner and required report or evidence package. THONIS will reply with a fit assessment and next step. A call is optional. Do not send sensitive evidence through first contact.
Start an AssuranceOps fit review