Dextra SyntheSys
SyntheSys is designed to turn scattered engineering sources into a shared, human-reviewed understanding of your system. Use that baseline to develop requirements and views, assess change, and prepare handoffs to modeling tools.
Product boundary. Production integrations, customer-specific compliance, operational authorization, and accepted results require implementation and evidence in the selected environment.
Built forChief engineers, system architects, MBSE leads, domain experts, model authorities, and program integrators
This is the complete product direction. Current evidence and customer-specific production implementation are separated below.
Current product view · synthetic workflow
The illustrative view introduces a shared system interpretation before dependent requirements and views. A tailored walkthrough can examine one authorized, non-sensitive architecture example.
This public view uses synthetic, rights-cleared data. It illustrates a workflow without exposing customer records or implementation-sensitive detail.
Illustrative synthetic product viewSelected source-review, baseline, view, change, and export workflows have been implemented and tested in a local test environment using synthetic examples. Platform scope describes the intended architecture lifecycle. First-time setup is not yet qualified. Live exchange with modeling tools, import accuracy in target tools, and operational use remain to be verified.
Compare with your current tools: Can your current toolchain show conflicting sources, the accepted interpretation, its reviewer, and which views or exports need review after a revision?
Illustrative sequence for SyntheSys. Requirements, interfaces, architecture views, model repositories, diagrams, review decks, and tacit decisions drift into competing interpretations. Teams generate dependent views before agreeing on meaning, then discover the contradiction late. SyntheSys is designed to turn scattered engineering sources into a shared, human-reviewed understanding of your system. Use that baseline to develop requirements and views, assess change, and prepare handoffs to modeling tools. AI may extract, compare, propose relationships, explain uncertainty, and ask questions. Qualified people correct the interpretation and accept the baseline, standards policy, conformance claim, and downstream use.
01Where the work breaks
Requirements, interfaces, architecture views, model repositories, diagrams, review decks, and tacit decisions drift into competing interpretations. Teams generate dependent views before agreeing on meaning, then discover the contradiction late.
SYSTEM UNDERSTANDING
No completeness claim: the bounded corpus has not been declared. The product says so rather than reporting a coverage number it cannot support.
SYNTHETIC CORPUSA number the product refuses to report
02What changes
SyntheSys is designed to turn scattered engineering sources into a shared, human-reviewed understanding of your system. Use that baseline to develop requirements and views, assess change, and prepare handoffs to modeling tools.
HARBOR SENTINEL MISSION · SYNTHETIC
All targets use the same accepted evidence and semantic identities; output fidelity and exceptions remain explicit.
SYNTHETIC CORPUSOne accepted meaning, before anything is generated from it
03Where authority stops
AI may extract, compare, propose relationships, explain uncertainty, and ask questions. Qualified people correct the interpretation and accept the baseline, standards policy, conformance claim, and downstream use.
CONFORMANCE
Do not claim Type 3 or Type 4 conformance until the vendor clarification and the exact profile baseline are pinned.
SYNTHETIC CORPUSThe boundary the product draws around its own claims
04What you are left with
A source revision should not erase the earlier engineering decision. Reviewers can inspect its accepted basis and identify dependent work that needs another review.
Scope a SyntheSys caseVALUE LEDGER
An industry-cited estimate, not measured savings from this run.
SYNTHETIC CORPUSWhat is accounted for, and what is still zero
What changes in daily work
Requirements, interfaces, architecture views, model repositories, diagrams, review decks, and tacit decisions drift into competing interpretations. Teams generate dependent views before agreeing on meaning, then discover the contradiction late.
A source revision should not erase the earlier engineering decision. Reviewers can inspect its accepted basis and identify dependent work that needs another review.
One guided operating flow
Define the system, intended use, baseline, timeframe, authorities, target frameworks, outputs, and authorized source corpus.
Analyze the whole bounded corpus, preserve source coverage and contradiction, and present one provisional system interpretation.
Capture attributed corrections and ask dependency-ranked questions with choices, Unknown, defer, and free-text paths.
Bind accepted meaning, source identity, decisions, standards policy, and target strategy into one versioned semantic baseline.
Produce foundational views first, then dependent requirements, behavior, interfaces, traceability, analysis, and reports.
Keep every output and modeling-tool path tied to the same baseline; mark affected work stale when meaning changes.
Recognizable starting workflows
Before you evaluate
SyntheSys is designed to prepare modeling-tool handoffs from a human-reviewed system baseline. Modeling-tool exchange remains a product direction. Each target needs its own validation; the public view does not establish live Cameo exchange, target-tool import accuracy or repository mutation.
SyntheSys is designed to present a provisional system interpretation for human correction before dependent requirements and views are relied on. An evaluation should preserve the conflicting sources, the interpretation the team accepted and the reviewer, rather than treating a generated model as the final authority.
Start with one authorized, non-sensitive architecture example. Check source coverage, unresolved conflicts, the accepted baseline and which requirements, views or exports need review after a source revision. Verify target-tool results separately. Selected workflows are tested locally; first-time setup and operational use are not yet qualified.
Review the THONIS Trust Center · Review standards and applicability
Integration, compliance, and trust
Documents, requirements, interface records, data dictionaries, model repositories, engineering data, and accepted source systems remain attributable.
SyntheSys keeps whole-system understanding, correction, semantic baseline, requirements, diagrams, analyses, decisions, and change in one architecture case.
Modeling-tool exchange is a product direction. Each selected output requires target-specific validation; live Cameo or repository mutation is not established by the public view.
Integrate output paths without creating a second meaning of the system. Target-specific support and conformance are verified against the selected environment before being claimed.
AI interpretation remains visibly provisional until a named reviewer corrects and accepts the controlling semantics.
Foundational operational and structural meaning is established before dependent views can be treated as ready.
A changed source, decision, or target policy marks affected outputs stale and preserves the prior accepted state.
SyntheSys can govern customer-selected architecture frameworks, UAF and SysML profiles, modeling-tool paths, traceability policies, and verification rules. Official conformance and authoritative model release remain specific to the selected standard, toolchain, configuration, and approving organization.
Start with the workflow that keeps breaking
Describe the system boundary, intended use, authoritative sources, target frameworks and tools, required outputs, review authority, security boundary, and the inconsistency that costs the team the most. Do not send controlled architecture data through first contact.
Scope a SyntheSys case