Security and GRC teams
Get a security review ready for a decision
Scope a response draft with evidence references, unresolved questions and named approval for one customer review.
See the review sprint →
FIND YOUR STARTING POINT
What is holding up your team?
Choose the task you need to finish. Each path explains who it helps, what you can evaluate and how to scope the next step.
Services are scoped individually. Product demonstrations use synthetic data; an engagement requires an agreed scope, fee and acceptance criteria.
Four starting points
Match the task to the right help.
Technical publications and engineering teams
Keep technical documents current
Connect source changes to the procedures, reviews and releases they affect.
Explore TRACE →Small teams working across several tools
Find the workflow bottleneck to fix first
Scope a diagnostic with 3–5 prioritized automation recommendations. Agree implementation and acceptance tests separately.
See workflow discovery →Technical founders and lean marketing teams
Turn technical work into clear marketing
Scope a Content Studio pilot: a campaign brief, reviewable drafts or an explainer plan from approved sources, plus a measurement plan.
Explore Content Studio →Specialist use cases
A more specific problem?
These paths have different proof and readiness boundaries. Start with the applicable scope.
Review an AI assistant before a customer or release decision
For security/GRC teams evaluating a document-trained assistant or AI workflow. Scope the assistant, its access to tenant data, test cases and the evidence a named reviewer needs. AI Release Check is a candidate assessment scope within AssuranceOps; production testing requires an agreed environment and authorization.
Explore the security assessment workflowFind gaps in a defense or service-member document packet
Discovery scopes include SF-86/PVQ draft completeness for a contractor security team, promotion-board record self-review, and technical-manual/parts-list navigation. These are prospective TRACE use cases, not released self-service tools. Scope the applicable rules and local data boundary before any records are shared. A gap report does not determine clearance, promotion, eligibility or operational approval.
Discuss a record-review scopeKeep engineering documents and system models aligned
For system architects and MBSE teams resolving conflicting requirements and model views. SyntheSys is designed around an accepted system baseline and explicit unresolved questions.
Explore SyntheSysReview authority for an autonomous mission action
For autonomy developers, integrators and mission authorities. Sentinel explores policy checks, human approval, degraded operation and the after-action record. Public examples are simulations.
Explore SentinelDescribe the workflow—not the sensitive evidence
Describe one task, its owner and deadline.
A short description is enough to assess fit. Keep credentials, personal records, CUI and sensitive customer material out of the first inquiry.
Discuss the workflow